Record

Every probability we have stated and every dated test we have set, with the date it was made and what happened. Nothing here is deleted. When a weight moves, the old weight stays on the page as a revision.

4

4

stated probabilities

stated probabilities

10

10

dated tests

dated tests

0

0

resolved

resolved

—

—

Brier score

Brier score

Dec 2027

Dec 2027

first resolution due

first resolution due

Calibration

Stated probability against realized frequency

Stated probability against realized frequency

0%0%25%25%50%50%75%75%100%100%perfect calibrationStated probabilityRealized frequency
No claims have resolved yet.Stated weights sit on the axis as open markers. The first points rise in December 2027.

Each stated probability becomes a point once it resolves: its probability on the horizontal axis, and the share of claims at that probability that came true on the vertical. A well-calibrated record sits on the diagonal. The Brier score summarizes the same thing as one number; lower is better, and 0.25 is what coin-flipping earns.

Brier score over N resolved claims, p the stated probability, o the outcome (1 or 0)

BS = (1/N) Σ (pᵢ − oᵢ)²

Rules of the ledger

Set once, applied to every piece

Set once, applied to every piece

  1. 1

    A probability enters the ledger the day it is published, with the piece and the resolution rule beside it. It can be revised at a quarterly review, and every revision stays visible.

  2. 2

    A dated test enters with its due date and what each outcome would favour. It resolves as passed, failed or not observable; a test that could not be observed is recorded as such, not quietly dropped.

  3. 3

    Resolution uses the sources named in the piece. Where a definition is still open, the test shows as definitions pending and does not count toward the score until it is fixed.

  4. 4

    Non-event cost and service signals need two consecutive reviews to move a weight; a license order or a missed dated gate can count at once. Independent confirmation is required for load-bearing invoices.

  5. 5

    Scores are computed from resolved claims only. We do not grade our own confidence words; we record them so readers can.

  6. 6

    When a thesis fails, the autopsy is published alongside the record, not instead of it.

Stated probabilities

Scenario weights with their revision history. Each column is a quarterly review; filled columns are published weights, empty ones are reviews still to come.

Technology

Resolves when a terminal state is confirmed at a quarterly review, or at the end of the 2030–2040 horizon. The gates below are the evidence that moves these weights.

Nov 6, 2026
Published
Mar 2027
Jun 2027
Sep 2027
Dec 2027
Mar 2028
Jun 2028
Sep 2028
Dec 2028
Ground catches up 15%Orbital rollout stalls 35%Orbit finds a niche 40%Broader parity 10%

Growth or Grind

Economics

No weights stated. The piece proposes an end-2030 classification into four terminal branches without weights; weights enter the ledger only if a future review assigns them.

Terminal branches, in order of precedence: an enacted, attributable market-pressure fiscal turn; otherwise documented financing accommodation; otherwise growth with retained fiscal capture; otherwise residual grind. Definitions and the attribution protocol are still to be fixed, so this is recorded as logic, not as a scored claim.

Dated tests

The falsifiers each piece set for itself, with the date by which they must be observed and which side a result would favour.

Evidence checked through Nov 6, 2026

Evidence checked through Nov 6, 2026

DuePieceTestA pass would favourStatus
Due by end of 2027
Dec 31, 2027What a free rocket wouldn't fixActual upper-stage reflight. Catching a vehicle alone does not establish reuse.OrbitOpen
Dec 31, 2027What a free rocket wouldn't fixLouisiana construction, financing and project-specific review record.No Louisiana application reported as of Oct 28, 2026, single source.OrbitOpen
Dec 31, 2027What a free rocket wouldn't fixA delivered launch offer with payload, orbit and recovery terms.Posted $3,364/kg reference is not an offer for a compute mission.OrbitOpen
Dec 31, 2027What a free rocket wouldn't fixA reproducible satellite bill of materials with fully annualized IT replacement costs.OrbitOpen
Dec 31, 2027What a free rocket wouldn't fixGround projects that actually deliver power, with complete costs and usable-service dates.GroundOpen
Dec 31, 2027Growth or GrindThe end-2027 core-CPI test the timing claim is held to.Threshold as stated in the piece; recorded here by reference.Timing claimOpen
Due by end of 2029
Dec 31, 2029What a free rocket wouldn't fixA full year of thermal telemetry with failures reported separately; at least 100 GPU-years and one flight-year.Silent corruption and permanent loss reported as separate lines.OrbitOpen
Due by end of 2030
Dec 31, 2030What a free rocket wouldn't fixPaid launch invoices, compute-only manufacturing mass and observed hardware costs; workloads assessed on useful output and availability.OrbitOpen
Dec 31, 2030What a free rocket wouldn't fixLaunch cadence checkpoint: 1,000 or more completed flights a year favours orbit; fewer than 300 weakens the large-ramp branch.Current reading: 25 authorized per year, Texas. Completions not yet observable.Orbit at ≥1,000; Ground below 300Open
Dec 31, 2030Growth or GrindBranch classification into one of four terminal states, by precedence.Definitions and attribution protocol not yet fixed.UnweightedDefinitions pending

Stated confidence

Recorded as written. These are not scored; they are here so a reader can compare what we said with what happened.

Piece
On mechanism
On timing
Stated
Medium
Low
Nov 6, 2026
Growth or Grind
Medium
Low, and low on fiscal capture
Nov 6, 2026
Hypothesis stage
Not yet dated
Nov 7, 2026

Resolved

Nothing has resolved yet.

The first dated tests are due December 31, 2027. This section will show each one with the evidence used to resolve it.